How To Use Manual Extension Tubes Or Reverse Rings

Harlo fellow macro enthusiasts! Looks like the rainy season is here; I hope you get to photograph a lot of awesome creatures this time around! Today I would like to address some simple techniques worth knowing if you are planning to take your macro photographs using manual (non-electronic) Extension Tubes (ET) or Reverse Rings (RR). IF you are using auto Extension Tubes, then this article is not relevant to you.

A Reverse Ring and Manual Extension Tubes are the cheapest accessories to start Macro Photography

Basic tools of the trade. Extension Tubes and Reverse Rings are some of the most affordable accessories to start one’s path into the world of Macro Photography. Attachment of these screw-type accessories is pretty straightforward.

Most beginners tend to buy cheap manual macro accessories (~RM30) like these to hone their skills before really moving on to the big guns. However, unlike most would have expect, these accessories don’t always work straightforwardly when paired to your DSLR or lenses, regardless of the brand.

To be honest I have never really thought of writing this article until I have got some beginners asking for help quite recently. I have always thought that there were plenty of similar guides around, but to my surprise there weren’t a lot; and some solutions found on the web are simply ridiculous!

 

Kitlens and Prime lens

Although Extension Tubes and Reverse Rings work with any type of lens, not all lenses work perfectly with them, and thus giving technical problems to the photographer.

Inquirers using manual accessories usually have problems getting the lens (be it kitlens, prime lens or even macro lenses) to employ the appropriate aperture values when Extension Tubes (ET) or Reverse Rings (RR) were used. In short, when a manual ET or RR is used, the electronic connectivity or communication between the lens and the DSLR body becomes cut off, and the DSLR body decides to “act smart” and (i) automatically block changes of aperture value; (ii) close the aperture to its minimum; OR (iii) disallow photo snapping entirely.

Unfortunately, at the time of writing I am only familiar with Nikon and Canon systems, so I will just focus on these two (I don’t mind testing on new systems provided there are “tributes” hehe XD).

Nikon

*You should not have any problems using manual ET or RR if you are using manual lenses with aperture rings e.g. Nikkor 50mm F1.8d.

For Nikon DSLRs, whenever manual Extension Tubes (ET) or Reverse Rings (RR) are used, the DSLR body can no longer detect the lens and will automatically indicate the aperture value as  “F0” (or F– in older models).

A Nikon DSLR losing aperture control

The “F0” or “F–” indicates that the DSLR body no longer detects a lens, which is normal when you equip a manual Extension Tube or Reverse Ring that do not have a circuit that connects the lens to the DSLR body. However, with this indicator you can no longer adjust the aperture of your lens via the DSLR body.

If you are using lenses without manual aperture control (most newer Nikkor lenses do not have these anymore), you will not be able to manually adjust the aperture size; and since Nikkor lenses will close the aperture down to its minimum (e.g. F22) when not connected to the DSLR body, the very small aperture means very little light can pass through the lens, so users will notice that everything looks very dark via the optical viewfinder, even on a very sunny day! Since you can barely see a thing through the viewfinder in addition to not being able change the aperture size, you cannot shoot any macro.

This issue lies with a rectangular, metallic lever behind the lens which controls the aperture blades (see photo below): You need to use something to hold it in place i.e. plasticine, tape, paper clips etc. so that it does not close the aperture as usual.

Nikkor lens- Aperture blades

The culprit! Nikkor lenses have a metal lever (red circle) at the back which controls the aperture of the lens. Unfortunately the lever will automatically shut the aperture to its minimum (often way too small for Macro Photography) when detached from a DSLR body. You can simply adjust the aperture opening (as seen above) by moving the metal lever, the trick is to keep it in place if you want to shoot Macro!

**Note: Please take note that if you are not careful, you might end up damaging the Autofocus capabilities of your lens! I usually set the AF on both the DSLR and lens to Manual whenever I use manual ET or RR.

Manual aperture control

By using an apparatus to prevent the metal lever from automatically closing the aperture blades, you will have sufficient light to be able to take Macro Photographs.

By using an apparatus to move the metal lever and keep it in place, you can observe and adjust the size of the aperture opening. Still, you should avoid opening the aperture to its largest i.e. lower F value (F1.8 for 50mm F1.8, F3.5 for 18-55mm F3.6-F5.6 kitlens etc.). This is because the very wide apertures will translate to ridiculously shallow Depth of Field when shooting Macro, where you will have a very hard time keeping subjects in focus. For more info about Aperture, Magnification and Depth of Field, please read here: Overcoming Shallow Depth of Field in Macro Photography.

The usual aperture values for Macro shots are F11-F16. Of course, by setting the metal lever, you will not be able to guess the exact aperture value, so its basically just a guestimate.

**Note: Using more layers of Extension Tubes (ET) will cut the amount of light going into the DSLR, so the optical viewfinder may still look dark even when you have open up the len’s aperture blades using the technique above. Reverse Rings, on the other hand, do not suffer from this issue.

Canon

*I do not own a Canon system (Sorry guys, no photos huhu) but I was fortunate enough to briefly play around with one.

Using manual Extension Tubes (ET) and Reverse Rings (RR) on Canon DSLRs is relatively straightforward. Unlike Nikon counterparts, Canon lenses do not have aperture levers so you do not get any “F0 or F–” values when these macro accessories are connected. The only issue is that you cannot change aperture settings since most common Canon lenses do not have manual aperture controls. However, as far as I know, Canon lenses tend to return to their widest apertures when unattached, so if you are pairing a EF 50mm F1.8 II via manual ET or RR, you will get an aperture of F1.8 which will generate a Depth of Field (DOF) too thin for proper macro shots. For more info on DOF, again please refer to this article: Overcoming Shallow Depth of Field in Macro Photography.

This can be solved by using the DoF Preview button on your DSLR. All you need to do is attach your 50mm prime lens (or any other Canon lens) normally (i.e. without ET or RR) onto your Canon DSLR and then set the aperture to the value desired (usually F16 for macro shots). Holding the DoF Preview button on your DSLR body, remove the lens and then install the ER or RR and you will be able to shoot at the aperture value set (e.g. F16).

Alright, I guess that’s all for now, will update if I have any more info, especially those pertaining to different camera systems. Although cheaper and of lower quality, manual Extension Tubes share the fundamental functions as more expensive counterparts, which means that you can take equally good macro photos if you know what you are doing XD Various techniques for Manual shooting can be found in the following two articles: Macro Photography- Auto Focus or Manual Focus? and Taking Better Macro Shots Part 5- Sharpness.

Okay, before I end, I would like to emphasize that although these plastic macro accessories can be very affordable, there are risks to using them, especially so for Nikon systems. If you are really into Macro Photography, it would be a better idea to opt for sturdier Extension Tubes with electric connectivity (i.e. Meike@~RM350 or Kenko@~RM500). These higher quality Extension Tubes can support heavier lens (e.g. macro 90mm, 100mm, 105mm F2.8 etc. or any other lens), and more importantly enable autofocusing for faster and more accurate captures (particularly good for fast-moving subjects)! Definitely worth the money you pay for.

A burden to bear

Cheap Reverse Rings and Manual Extension Tubes are mostly made of plastic and might not be able to support the weight of heavier lenses such as the 18-105mm kitlens in this photo.

That’s all for today I guess hehe, with these simple accessories, you are on your way to become a Macro Photographer. One of the best ways to take great macro shots is to use a proper flash and diffuser, which will not only make your subjects pop up more, but also “freeze” moments (for uncooperative, moving subjects).

Flash and diffusion is important in Macro Photography

Adding a simple DIY diffuser will help improve your macro shots ALOT, and making them stand out from the rest.

PS: Took one shot of a ladybug using the setup above (Nikon D90) but with a standard Nikkor 18-105mm F3.5-5.6 kitlens instead:

Ladybug

Macro Photographs taken manually can be as equally good, all you need is practice, patience and of course, good diffused lighting.

Cheers!

 

 

** All photos in this website are taken and owned by me. The use of any photos here is not allowed without my permission. 

 

Magnification: Frequently Asked Questions

I am back again guys! I have been spending my time preparing better flash diffusers for my new macro setup (check out My Macro Rig for more details) which will hopefully produce even better photos. I hope you all are doing great too!

Transverse LadyBird (Coccinella cf. transversalis) copulation

Ladybug Porn. Taking magnified shots can be great l fun! But just how many understand the theory behind magnification?

Anyway, I am writing this article since I have recently got a few questions from keen beginners in Macro Photography on top of being encouraged by Macro Enthusiasts. It seems that some still do not fully understand how macro or its accessories works; thus I will be covering some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) here today. Of course, feel free to ask should you have any more questions after reading this article~

Actually some of the contents below have already been covered in Macro Photography- 1:1 Magnification Explained which I have written some time ago in my old blog but I suppose it might have been overlooked, so please feel free to check out that article.

The following are some of questions I got asked most about magnification:

1. “What is 1:1 ratio in magnification?”

1:1 is basically the comparison between the size of your object against that of your camera sensor. For example, if your camera sensor is 24mm (Length) x 36mm (Width); at 1:1 ratio, when you frame a bug perfectly i.e. the head touching the top of the frame and the abdomen touching the bottom, you will know that the bug is precisely 24mm in length (Please see photo below for details).

Macro Magnification- 1:1 Ratio

Picture demonstrating the meaning of 1:1 magnification. At this ratio, a 24mm bug will fit precisely into a camera with a sensor length of 24mm, through this you will be able to measure the size of your subjects at 1:1. *Diagrams not drawn to scale.

In short, by shooting at 1:1, you will know how big your subjects really are. Of course, this is not too much of a concern unless if you are taking scientific shots for size measurements.

Also, please do take note that not all DSLR sensor sizes are 24mm x 36mm, and there are different ratios when it comes to Macro Photography. Please read here if you are interested in them: Macro Photography- 1:1 Magnification Explained.

 2. “What lens do I need for Macro Photography?”

The great thing about Macro Photography is that it is cheap: you can actually take extreme close-up shots using any lens you already have (even kitlens), with only a few exceptions like ultra wide angle (UWA) lens etc.

However, normal lens have a certain limit to how close you can actually get to a subject, which is why you cannot normally take proper macro shots with just a standard lens. You will require some accessories like Reverse Rings, Extension Tubes, Teleconverters or Macro Conversion Lens to help attain sufficient magnification.

50mm F1.8 prime lens with Extension Tubes

Even the Nifty-Fifty that most people get as their 2nd lens can work as a decent macro lens. You just need to right accessories to pair with it.

Of course, if you have the budget, you can always consider specialized lenses dedicated for Macro Photography. These lenses will definitely have a 1:1 magnification label on them. Dedicated macro lens allow you to get really close to your subject even without the accessories mentioned above.

3. “I’ve heard that a dedicated macro lens can make great portrait lens too, is it true?”

Definitely! Contrary to what most beginners believe, a macro lens not only allow you to take up-close shots, but distant, everyday shots as well.  Thus, if you are interested in both Macro and Portrait photography, you can always consider macro lenses. In fact, I love and use my Nikkor 105mm F2.8 so much that it is not my favourite lens, even though I have a Nikkor 24-70mm F2.8!

Putrajaya Photowalk 7

Macro lenses, especially those with long focal lengths, make wonderful portrait lenses as well. This shot was taken with my Nikkor 105mm F2.8 VR macro lens.

4. “If I want higher magnification, I should choose a macro lens with longer focal length right?”

This misconception often pops up among Macro enthusiasts, even seasoned ones. A lens with a longer focal length doesn’t mean you can get higher magnification. For example, a 180mm macro lens will not get you more magnified shots than say, a 50mm macro lens.

All dedicated macro lens (excluding only the Canon MPE-65) boasting 1:1 magnification WILL get you that specific maximum magnification, and that’s it. This means that at 1:1, the resulting photo taken using a 50mm, 100mm, 180mm etc. macro lens will be similar.

So, how are they different in terms of Macro? The main difference between a 50mm and a 180mm macro lens is the distance required to attain 1:1 magnification: you can get 1:1 magnification of a subject at a farther distance using a 180mm macro lens as compared to a 50mm lens. Please see photo below for details:

Macro Magnification- Effect Of Focal Length On Magnification

Macro lenses with longer focal length do not offer higher magnification, they just allow you to reach 1:1 from a farther distance. Note Distance C > B > A. *Diagrams not drawn to scale.

A longer macro lens allows you to shoot from a greater distance, thus minimizing the chances of scaring certain creatures away. Of course, the longer working distance means higher susceptibility to shakes due to movements (hand, wind etc.), and then there’s the higher price to consider.

5. “How do I increase magnification beyond 1:1?”

Most Macro Enthusiasts will not be satisfied with 1:1 magnification since it is not capable of properly capturing slightly smaller creatures, say those <1cm. This is when, again, we use Reverse Rings, Extension Tubes, Teleconverters or Macro Conversion Lenses to increase magnification. Please see Point 6 and 7 for elaboration.

Siler semiglaucus ♂

Cute Jumping Spiders (Siler semiglaucus) like this are very tiny and fast: 1:1 is not enough to photograph them, which is why most Enthusiasts go beyond 1:1.

6. “How do Reverse Rings, Extension Tubes and Macro Conversion Lenses work?”

Reverse Rings, Extension Tubes, Teleconverters and Macro Coversion Lenses enable higher magnification by shortening the effective minimum focusing distance, thus allowing you to get really close to your subjects, even when you are not using a dedicated macro lens. Please see photo below for better illustration on how they work. To learn more about how to use a Reverse Ring and Manual Extension Tubes, please read HERE.

Macro Magnification- How Accessories Work

Illustration depicting the different methods Reverse Rings, Extension Tubes (or Teleconverters) and Macro Conversion Lenses employ to allow you to get closer to your subjects for magnified shots. **Diagrams are for illustration only; Minimum Focusing Distance measured from the lens for simplicity.

7. “Which is better? Reverse Rings, Extension Tubes or Macro Conversion Lenses?”

Each macro accessories have their own advantages and disadvantages, so which one to choose depends on your budget, performance expectations and your available gears. For more details, please read this article: Getting Your First Camera.

8. “Why would I need a dedicated macro lens when virtually every other lens is capable of macro with the right accessories?”

This is a good question, even though most lenses can be converted into “macro” lenses, they might not be as versatile or specialized as a dedicated macro lens. Apart from the ability to achieve 1:1 magnification, most macro lenses tend to be sharper than normal lenses (especially at high F values required for close-ups), autofocus faster yet relatively compact. Higher-end macro lenses tend to be weather-sealed too.

Argiope versicolor ♀ building stabilimenta

A St. Andrew Cross Spider (Argiope versicolor) building its stabilimentum- a web structure which provides support and stability. A fast Autofocus (AF) system on a dedicated macro lens will let you capture moments like this more effectively, even at relatively dim conditions.

So, if you are really interested in Macro Photography, and have some money to spend, a dedicated macro lens is always good to have!

Guess that’s all I can remember at this time, please feel free to ask if you have some more questions about magnification in Macro Photography. I will add them into the article if deemed suitable. Thank you for reading and have a wonderful day!

** All photos in this website are taken and owned by me. The use of any photos here is not allowed without my permission. 

My Macro Setup

(Updated 17.07.2014)

A Macro Rig is an essential tool to any Macro Photographer, which, when paired with great photography skills, one can create stunning images like no other. Although the available macro lens and DSLR body you can choose in the market are rather limited, the extremely diverse range of macro accessories (reverse rings, teleconverters, magnifying lens, microscopic lens, bellows, extension tubes, flash bracket etc.), offers unlimited customizations to your core Macro Rig. And we haven’t even started talking about DIY accessories!

Macro Rig-  An essential tool for up-close photography

A Macro Rig can be as simple as a DSLR and a macro-capable lens, or as complicated as a bazooka! It all depends on the photographer, and what he or she wants!

This is why virtually every Macro Photographer will have a Macro Setup different from one another; this is because different photographers look at different aspects when it comes to selecting their equipment, which include performance, portability, ergonomics, affordability etc. Regardless of what you prioritize, there is certainly a setup out there that is suitable for you.

Most of the Macro Enthusiasts out there would have some photos of the Macro Setups they have used, or are currently using; just to share with the world what they think is suitable for them (and perhaps you). Well, needless to say, I am one of them XD This particular article records the Macro Rigs I used to have until the ones I am using now. Of course, to make the article more informative, I will try to add in some Straight Out Of Camera (SOOC) shots. Since I am still not a pro, the setups that I am using now might not be the best out there, and my expectations may change with time and skills. Regardless, the Macro Rigs will be shared here with each upgrade.

Frankly, I am not a creative guy, and I am not at all good at DIY stuffs. And unfortunately I didn’t have a macro guru to guide me. So designing my own Macro Rig has always been a problem for me. Nevertheless, I still have priorities in customizing my equipment. As a Scientist who has to collect samples and make observations during my trips, I really appreciate having a Macro Set that is performs well, preferably weather-sealed yet portable and doesn’t break apart easily. This is also a reason why I try to avoid DIY stuffs, especially diffusers: mine tend to come off a tad too easily >_<

** This is going to be a very long post since I am constantly updating it 😛

** I have not gotten the chance to take sample photos for each setup, but stay tune for them 🙂

Macro Rig 1- Mark I

Macro Setup- Mark I

Mark I– My First Macro Rig, consisting of a simple 50mm prime lens, automatic extension tubes and a flashgun.

 

By the time I was introduced to Macro Photography, I have already own a DSLR and was my way to becoming an advanced amateur in (Normal) Photography. I was more into Portrait Photography that time and had bought a 50mm prime lens and a Nikon SB-700 flashgun plus a strobist set for strobe shots. Unfortunately I wasn’t very good with it :p.

Anyway, since I already have a good DSLR body, lens and flashgun, I only needed an accessory to allow magnification to complete my first Macro Rig. As mentioned in Getting Your First Macro Gear, the three most common macro accessories to get are (i) Reverse Ring, (ii) Extension Tubes or (iii) Macro Conversion Lens. I didn’t have a hard time choosing since I was pretty sure I would love Macro Photography (I have been taking macro shots using my first Point-and-Shoot long before I had a DSLR). I chose an autofocus-capable, sturdy but also the most expensive option- Kenko Extension Tubes. This proved to be a great pick since it is fast, rigid and convenient to use. What’s more, Nikon cameras will have aperture problems if you choose to use cheap, plastic Extension Tubes or Reverse Rings (To be covered later).

With the Extension Tubes, I had some test runs with Natural Lighting and soon switched to flash. I had no idea that light diffusion was so important in Macro Photography then, so I just use my SB-700 with the bounce card up for lighting. The flash was held with my left hand and fired wireless. Sometimes I use my pinky finger to support the lens for reduced handshakes.

 

Pros:

– Lightweight, can be used one handed i.e. one hand holding the camera, the other the flash.

– Simple setup, easy to gain access to hard-to-reach areas i.e. leaves, bushes etc.

 – At 3x ET, the very short focal lengths require the user to get very close to the subject; hence everything is larger and clearer through the optical viewfinder, thus easier to see which parts of the subjects are really in focus.

 – Since the flash is handheld, lighting manipulation can be done very easily.

Cons:

– Switching in between ET is very time consuming and risks dropping the lens or missing the moment.

– The need to get really close for higher magnification is not feasible for sensitive insects.

 – The flash + bounce card diffusing technique still produces harsh lightings, especially when shooting subjects on walls or shooting subjects directly from the front.

 

Macro Rig 2- Mark II

Macro Setup- Mark II

Mark II– Addition of a dedicated macro lens to the Mark I setup.

I took quite a lot of macro shots using Mark I, and ignorant as I am, I still didn’t figure out the key to better images is to improve light diffusion, as covered in How To Take Better Macro Shots- Lighting. However, I realized that I really fancy Macro Photography, and will probably keep shooting while I can, and this was enough~ After all, the most important thing is passion.

Regardless, I do notice the drawbacks of Mark I:  I am annoyed with the extremely short working range of the 50mm plus all Extension Tubes (36mm + 20mm + 12mm). A working distance of ~3-5cm will scare most subjects away, thus losing the shot. Also, the time taken to switch in between tubes can be inconvenient and risky. Additionally, the approximate 1:1 magnification is hardly enough for my use. This was when I have decided to purchase a 100mm macro lens from Nikon, making up Mark II, which is basically a very basic setup. I shot using the same flash method. I have temporarily placed my Extension Tubes aside.

During this time I have made some great macro friends, and learnt about some of the wise and famous within the field. Thanks to them, I have gotten the chance to learn about weaknesses in my skills and gears.

 

Pros (105mm set):

– The 105mm F2.8 is an awesome lens, enabling shots from far (portraits) to near (macro), very versatile.

– The 105mm lens allows magnification of up to 1:1 from a distance, thus very good for sensitive, or flying subjects.

– The 105mm micro lens come with Autofocus and Vibration Reduction (VR). Although I don’t use VR, autofocus does come in handy for large subjects.

– Since the flash is handheld, lighting manipulation can be done very easily (as long as the subjects are not too far away).

Cons (105mm set):

– The long minimum focal length will make photographing small subjects challenging since it will be hard to determine which parts (usually the eyes) are in focus.

– The farther effective working distance will mean higher prone to hand shakes.

– The 105mm lens is not capable of going beyond 1:1.

– The focusing system is not stellar when it comes to shooting small subjects, with the lens often undergoing AF hunting. Its even worse when shooting via LiveView.

– The flash + bounce card diffusing technique still produces harsh lightings, especially when shooting subjects on walls or shooting subjects directly from the front.

 

Macro Rig 3- Mark III

Macro Setup- Mark III

Mark III– A huge improvement in terms of magnification and light diffusion, courtesy of advices from the Macro gurus!

 

It didn’t take me long to notice that the 100mm lens, although very fast, accurate and sharp, is not suitable for highly magnified shots. This is because at 1:1 (which is not enough for many cases), the Depth of Field (DOF) becomes too thin to produce good photos of tiny subjects (say <1cm) on top of the susceptibility to handshakes.

So, the solution was simple, I “reappointed” my trustworthy Kenko Extension Tubes. By adding these tubes, the magnification of the entire system increased, meaning I could take 1:1 shots even before I turn the dials of the 100mm macro lens to “1:1” (The magnification ratio of the lens becomes inaccurate once you add on macro accessories).

I started off with all three levels of Extension Tubes (36mm + 20mm + 12mm), and quickly noticed that the very high magnification means the chances of getting a blurred shot (caused by wind, subject or body movement) is high. Also, the Kenko tubes (three levels) had problems supporting the heavy 100mm lens. My 20mm Tube lost electronic connectivity and had to be sent back to the factory. From there, and as advised by my gurus, I shot using only the 36mm + 12mm Extension Tubes, and found that they are more than enough for most, if not all tiny subjects (<1cm).

Again, thanks to my Macro sifus, I have finally decided to improve the light diffusion capability of my Macro Rig. I have purchased a FotoPro dual flash bracket to hold the SB-700 flashgun in position, and a softbox to diffuse the light. Needless to say, the results improved tremendously despite the increased weight; the resulting light is much softer, creating shadows that are less harsh. I was really happy with the results, and shot A LOT with my Mark III.

 

Pros:

– This setup is still lighter than those with dual flashes.

– The inclusion of extension tubes to the 105mm F2.8 lens allows magnifications over 1:1. Smaller subjects will appear larger through the viewfinder, thus easier to see what is in focus.

– Even with ET, the 105mm is still able to zoom in and out to a decent degree, and hence still capable for use on a majority of sensitive insects.

– The softbox diffuse light magnificently, resulting in well lit photos, regardless of the positioning of the subjects.

Cons:

– Heavy (duh!). One hand shooting is close to impossible.

– The big softbox can sometimes be a hindrance when subjects are in a secluded location.

– Depth of Field (DOF) is very thin in this setup, which is normal for high magnifications. Of course, higher magnification = higher prone to hand shakes.

– This setup is not suitable for flying subjects.

– No support of the long lens plus ETs, which might strain the inner connections between the lens and DSLR body.

 

Macro Rig 4- Mark IV

Macro Setup- Mark IV

Mark IV– This setup improves light diffusion slightly with an inclusion of a 2nd wireless flash.

 

After some really heavy shooting using my Mark III, I have really improved a lot in terms of shooting and editing skills (at least that’s what I think :p), but unfortunately, the heavy usage really took a toll on my Macro Rig: Apart from some serious wear-and-tear here and there, I have also single-handedly broken three Octopus joints of my FotoPro flash bracket, partly because the weight of the SB-700 flashgun. Anyway, I paid a lot of attention to cleaning and maintaining my optics and I am glad I have not gotten any fungus contamination on my lenses.

The upgrade to Mark IV had one objective in mind- to produce better lighting. Since the flash on the Mark III is fired directly from the top, the light might sometimes be too harsh, especially on subjects with metallic carapace. The amount of shadows produced in Mark III could use some improvement as well. Since one side of my flash bracket is empty, I have decided to just get a small, but very popular flash in Macro Photography- Nikon SBR200 as a secondary flash. Since the SBR200 doesn’t come with a diffuser if you buy one individually, I had to DIY one myself, by using some polystyrene foam and paper.

The initial idea of Mark IV was to have the flash fired from two ends- one from the left, and one from the right which will theoretically “cancel out” the shadows. Unfortunately, the heavy weight of the SB-700 means it is not possible (broke another octopus joint :/). I had to revert to my original Mark III positioning of the SB700, with the SBR200 fired from the right side. The lighting was definitely better than that of Mark III, but not on par with my expectations. What’s more, my Macro Rig has become ridiculously heavy, and the continual breaking of the FotoPro flash bracket is not my idea of fun. I had to come up with a better alternative, and I thought of getting a second SBR200 flashgun to replace my SB-700 to shave off A LOT of weight.

On a side note, I have gotten a Macro Conversion Lens (the popular Raynox- 250) some time ago. It appears that this clip-on lens is not a very useful addition to a Macro Rig, unless if you are shooting something super, super small. Even that, you need some really serious skills and sturdiness to take such a shot.

Pros:

– Better light diffusion now that the light is somewhat from the side, leading to less shadows, better lighting. Less reflections off reflective subjects too 🙂

– The inclusion of extension tubes to the 105mm F2.8 lens allows magnifications over 1:1. Smaller subjects will appear larger through the viewfinder, thus easier to see what is in focus.

– Even with ET, the 105mm is still able to zoom in and out to a decent degree, and hence still capable for use on a majority of sensitive insects.

Cons:

– Very heavy and bulky! As if the Mark III was not already. One hand shooting is close to impossible. The heavy weight of the SB700 kept on breaking the joints flash brackets. I don’t think I can use the SB700 any more in future setups.

– The diffusers can sometimes be a hindrance when subjects are in a secluded location.

– Depth of Field (DOF) is very thin in this setup, which is normal for high magnifications. Of course, higher magnification = higher prone to hand shakes.

– This setup is not suitable for flying subjects.

– No support of the long lens plus ETs, which might strain the inner connections between the lens and DSLR body.

 

Macro Rig 5- Mark V

Macro Setup- Mark V

Mark V– Finally a dedicated macro machine. Of course, having one doesn’t mean photos will automatically be better, have to try and improve diffusion techniques.

 

I have very fortunately gotten a very great deal for a 2nd hand Nikon r1c1 macro set which has only been used twice! Needless to say, I have purchased it and took it out for a spin. Without the flash bracket and the SB-700 flashgun, my Macro Rig is now a hell lot lighter and less sophisticated, which is very good news to me. Of course, now that I know how important light diffusion is for Macro Photography, I have been trying to DIY some that will hopefully improve my shots. Will update more after I am familiar with the system.

Of course, I have not given up on my Mark IV. Now that I have three Nikon SBR200 flashguns (how come there aren’t any rechargeable 3V batteries in the market?!), I might try and see how they perform when attached to Mark IV.

[continued 17.07.2014]

Macro Rig 6- Mark VI

Okay, I have been able to play around with the r1c1 recently and have made some modifications to improve the light diffusion. The setup is basically similar as the above; just some extra PE foams and polystyrene foams for the SBR200 flashguns and also the lens (coined Front Board from here onwards). The Front Board is made of PE foam (recommended thanks to melnikor macrography sifu) to help diffuse the light coming off the twin SBR200.

Macro Setup- Mark VI

Mark VI– Is the Nikon r1c1 macro system THAT good?

 

Upon using Mark VI, I was very impressed with the portability (I forgot the meaning of lightness with the earlier setups! lol) and the simple light diffusion of the system. However, after a few more weeks using it, I started to notice some problems with this rig- it is more meant for extreme macro shots. This is due to the very limited flexibility in the flash angles and range which is not that suitable for taking macro shots of subjects farther away i.e. lizard, snake etc. (Please see below for more details)

 

Nikon r1c1 Pros and Cons

The Nikon r1c1 lighting system may be portable, but it might not be as versatile as expected when in comes to Macro Photography. (A) The design of the r1c1 ring allows the SBR200 flashguns to be placed very closely to a near subject, thus very useful for up-closed shots. More flashguns can be added for extra light. (B) The problem starts when you are photographing distant subjects, the reach of the SBR200 flashguns will not be enough, especially if you use a lot of diffusers. If you don’t, you will get harsh lighting. (C) You can raise up the Front Board (in Blue), but the super short distance between the light source and the diffuser renders diffusion less effective, resulting in rather concentrated lights, which may or may not hit your subject depending on your position and the angle of your Front Board. *** Please excuse my super awesome drawing :p

 

I, for one love to photography everything I see, be it big or small or distant or near, and I don’t want to spend minutes switching from one Macro Setup to another- I needed versatility, even if it means compromising weight. Thus, I immediately realized that this system may not be that suitable for my usual usage, unless if I want to take super up-close shots (but then the Raynox-250 Macro Conversion Lens doesn’t fit onto the r1c1!). Of course, I know that the light diffusion on the current Mark VI can still be further enhanced, but I simply cannot overlook this huge drawback.

 

Pros:

– Very portable

– Good for up-close to extreme up-close macro shots

– The r1c1 ring allows more flashguns for additional light

– The r1c1-SBR200 wireless infrared flash trigger is dead accurate

Cons:
– The short “arms” of the SBR200 result in lack of flexibility when it comes to shooting from different distance or magnification. They also prevent the usage of a larger Front Board

– Limited potential in improvement of light diffusion due to limited space

– r1c1 flash ring is not compatible with Raynox-250 (not sure about the other Raynox lenses)

– Relatively expensive compared to a DIY system, and might not perform as good too.

– Rechargeable CR123 batteries used in the SBR200 flashguns are not available in the market

 

Please don’t get me wrong, the Nikon r1c1 system is not entirely bad; just that it may not be that suitable for my needs. The r1c1 works extremely well for super up-close shots, which already caters to many of the Macro Enthusiasts out there. What’s more, despite the limitations in potential light diffusion, you are cutting off a lot in terms of weight and bulkiness- an important priority to some~

 

After I was done with Mark VI, I got into a little bit of a dilemma: I wasn’t sure whether I should continue to improve my previous Mark III (using flash brackets) or Mark VI (r1c1) systems; but I do know that I want a system that is versatile (suitable for photographing subjects that are large, small, near or far), even if it weighs a bit more than usual; the new system should be relatively cheap to maintain too.

I figured that I don’t like to spend the rest of my life to keep on buying CR123 batteries for the SBR200 flashguns and also r1c1 flash trigger, so I have decided to use back my good old SB-700 flashgun which is running on 4 rechargeable AA batteries. It may be heavier, but at least the batteries can be recharged and reused, and the SB700 should have better flash firing rates. At the same time I have already ruled out using the flash brackets of Mark III to hold the SB700 in place. This is because the flash bracket kept on breaking under the heavy weight of the SB700 flashgun, as mentioned earlier. With this sorted, I finally realized what I wanted, and out came Mark VII.

 

Macro Rig 7- Mark VII

Macro Setup- Mark VII

Mark VII- Going back to the basics; basics that works 🙂

 

The Mark VII is actually a prototype of what I really wanted to DIY. After all, its best to try and see whether it works before jumping the gun. Mark VII basically reuse everything I already have, featuring a SB700 flashgun attached directly to my D800 DSLR. The same Gamilight box-type flash diffuser was used, but with the base cut-off so that its shorter. A rounded diffusing board was placed in front of the box diffuser to channel light upwards and especially downwards. A half O-ring was also made from the same material, but with an extra layer of PE foam for extra diffusion. The function of each part is illustrated in the picture below:

Mark VII rig- Light diffsuion

Mark VII- A prototype to test whether light diffusion works with the flashgun on the DSLR body. As you can see, each part of the system plays a certain role in channelling the light to the subject.

 

There is much to love about my Mark VII macro rig. This is because it runs on a decently powerful SB700 with (happily) rechargeable AA batteries. Although slightly heavy, its not bulky. The relatively good channelling and diffusion of light produces pleasant, soft light.

 

Pros:

– All parts can be easily DIY without the need to spend extra money on accessories

– Most Macro Enthusiasts already has a flashgun

– Plenty of space for proper light diffusion

– Not bulky, especially if using a DX camera

– System works even for small and large subjects

– Raynox-250 compatible (if applicable)

Cons:

– Channelling and diffusion of light not that efficient- some light still wasted

– Slightly heavy

– Front Board may scare off some insects or creatures

– Flimsy parts

 

The curved diffusing board right in front of the box diffuser was placed there for a good reason- to channel the light downwards (the one channelled upwards are wasted unfortunately). The light channelled downwards will light up the lower parts of the O-ring diffusion board, which will theoretically give a half-O reflection in reflective surfaces. However, the poor usage and channelling resulted in insufficient light reaching the bottom of the O-ring board. This affected the shape of the reflection, especially apparent in eyes of jumping spiders (salticidae) (see photo below for illustration).

Multi-coloured Phintella- Phintella versicolor ♀

A cute Phintella versicolor jumping spider. Despite the wonderful light diffusion, the reflection of the lights from the eyes of the spider is less than satisfactory. This was because of too much light wastage in the Mark VII.

 

Now, the only way of improving this is by reducing light wastage. I supposed it is time to DIY my own box diffuser this time 😀

 

Macro Rig 8- Mark VIII

If you have read until this point, you must be a really patient guy or girl haha.. Still, I thank you all for reading and supporting me with my work~

I have to admit it sure takes up a lot of time to purposely set up each Macro Rig and photographing them, and then explaining about them. Still, I suppose sharing is caring; and I really hope you managed to learn new stuffs from this page.

Okay, as of now you probably know that I am a very meticulous and particular guy about my Macro Rig. I need my Macro Setup to be versatile (able to shoot subjects big or small, near or far) and with effective lighting, even at the expense of weight. I like to design and plan out each diffusing parts before I build them, and I don’t really like to try-and-error like others do: I just don’t have the patience and time to do that. So here we have the Mark VIII, which is a more efficient version of the prototype Mark VII.

 

Macro Setup- Mark VIII

Mark VIII- My first proper DIY project, built after much planning, calculations and designing. I guess I will need to polish it up soon, make it better looking ^_^

 

I have purposely put in a much larger box diffuser since the larger the surface area, the softer the light (Which will be covered in one of the upcoming articles). I have also lined 100% of the interiors of the box diffuser with aluminium foil (Note the commercial box diffuser in Mark VII does not have 100% reflectors inside) for more effective light channelling. The size of the box diffuser is designed in such a way that it will channel light directly onto the bottom part of the O-ring which was not achievable by the Mark VII. Also, since the top of the box diffuser is flat, less light is wasted shooting upwards. The addition of multiple PE foams or soft clothes will also help producing softer light. Below is a diagram showing the much more efficient light channelling of the Mark VIII:

Mark VIII rig- Light diffusion

Mark VIII light diffusion- an upgraded version of the Mark VII’s, with more effective usage of light; making sure most of them end up on the subject.

I have yet to be able to fully test the Mark VIII, but preliminary testing showed rather impressive results. I really look forward to use it soon.

 

Pros:

– All parts can be easily DIY without the need to spend extra money on accessories

– Most Macro Enthusiasts already has a flashgun

– Plenty of space for proper light diffusion

– System works even for small and large subjects

– Raynox-250 compatible (if applicable)

Cons:

– Channelling and diffusion of light not that efficient- some light still wasted

– Slightly heavy and bulky

– Front Board may scare off some insects or creatures

 

Of course, in theory there are still some limitations to this particular design. By right, using a much larger Front Board would’ve improve the light diffusion. But I am at this juncture still trying to find a suitable material for that.

Alright! That’s all for today guys, thank you for reading, I hope you learnt something here hehe~ Until the next time! Cheers!

 

 

 

 

 

** All photos in this website are taken and owned by me. The use of any photos here is not allowed without my permission. 

** Drawings are not drawn to scale and are for illustrations only.